Digest for jooq-user@googlegroups.com - 6 updates in 4 topics

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Digest for jooq-user@googlegroups.com - 6 updates in 4 topics

http://groups.google.com/group/jooq-user/topics mailing list
Lukas Eder <[hidden email]>: Oct 09 02:26PM +0200

Hi Daniel,
 
Thanks for your message. Unfortunately, this is currently not yet
supported. The relevant feature request is here:
https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/6261
 
You could try using a pre-processor to concatenate all your scripts into a
single one, prior to passing that to the DDLDatabase. If you're using
Maven, this would be rather simple with the maven-ant-plugin. Not sure if
there's a suitable Maven plugin for that specific task.
 
I hope this helps,
Lukas
 
2017-10-07 22:37 GMT+02:00 Daniel Einspanjer <[hidden email]
Lukas Eder <[hidden email]>: Oct 09 12:22PM +0200

Hi Daniel,
 
Thanks for your message. Indeed, this message deserves some additional
clarification as the code generator "knows" what the object really is. It
should add
 
- Object type
- Full qualification
 
I've added a feature request for this:
https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/6654
 
From what I've seen so far, it is mostly a routine, but in principle, it
could also be any of:
 
- UDT (unnamed attribute)
- Table (unnamed column)
- Index (unnamed column expression)
- Sequence (?)
 
I hope this helps,
Lukas
 
2017-10-07 22:34 GMT+02:00 Daniel Einspanjer <[hidden email]
Daniel Einspanjer <[hidden email]>: Oct 09 04:00AM -0700

Ah, now I get it. these are things like a stored parameter argument that
was not given an explicit name. So I should look at the generated code to
see what jooq actually did with it.
 
Thanks!
 
On Monday, October 9, 2017 at 6:22:36 AM UTC-4, Lukas Eder wrote:
Lukas Eder <[hidden email]>: Oct 09 01:14PM +0200

Yes, exactly. There should be a generated __1, __2, etc. parameter name.
The INFO log message is there to track down some issues where such
parameters are defaulted, and then jOOQ cannot send them to the server
unless an explicit value is given (if I remember correctly).
 
2017-10-09 13:00 GMT+02:00 Daniel Einspanjer <[hidden email]
Lukas Eder <[hidden email]>: Oct 09 01:13PM +0200

Hi Daniel,
 
Thank you very much for taking the time to report all these issues. I have
created and already fixed an issue for this particular one:
https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/6657
 
Thanks,
Lukas
 
 
 
2017-10-07 22:41 GMT+02:00 Daniel Einspanjer <[hidden email]
Lukas Eder <[hidden email]>: Oct 09 12:26PM +0200

Hi Daniel,
 
Thanks for your message. I think that XMLDatabase bit was the missing
piece. We'll fix this ASAP for 3.11, 3.10.1, and 3.9.7. Thanks for
documenting the workarounds in #6646. The original problem you're running
into is probably not the stack overflow error itself, but the fact that
arrays are not exported correctly by the XMLGenerator, which I've
registered as a separate issue:
https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/6653
 
Thanks,
Lukas
 
2017-10-08 19:34 GMT+02:00 Daniel Einspanjer <[hidden email]
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to [hidden email].